There are rumors too that a new UI is coming!


Recommended Posts

And? You can do that already. Tone down the transparency tweak the colors.

but I could see it as a enw theme, or may be even a sliver office theme

Okay, are you not actually bothering to look at the screenshot, or what?

It's the fading he's talking about.

I do have it out and i'm looking at it right now.

Might help if there wasn't the black box. Don't set up outlook if your gonna post screenshots, or make it so your e-mail doesn't show! (Ie; display name)

Is it even his Outlook? If it was, why would he be asking us about the UI?

So what that there are black boxes. It makes no frackin' difference. Look at the damn titlebar. There is a colour gradient. How more obvious can it get? Makes me wonder if you're intentionally being obtuse.

It could be wallpaper, it could be specific to Office. We don't know. That's the discussion.

So what that there are black boxes. It makes no frackin' difference. Look at the damn titlebar. There is a colour gradient. How more obvious can it get? Makes me wonder if you're intentionally being obtuse.

Yes it does make a "frackin' " diference, as half of the title bar has a mix between black and few shads of gray boxes. I see the transparency a little , but the boxes steal the show

and "obtuse"? :huh: is that some UK term?

Also

http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog/cns...#33;22891.entry

I don't know how old that bulid is, but I see nothing diferent,

Yes it does make a "frackin' " diference, as half of the title bar has a mix between black and few shads of gray boxes. I see the transparency a little , but the boxes steal the show

and "obtuse"? :huh: is that some UK term?

Oh, I give up. Use a dictionary, and use your damn eyes.

Anyway, I think that design, if real, could be a fairly nice way of getting rid of the file menu/toolbar background and borders.

Yes it does make a "frackin' " diference, as half of the title bar has a mix between black and few shads of gray boxes. I see the transparency a little , but the boxes steal the show

and "obtuse"? :huh: is that some UK term?

Also

http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog/cns&a...#33;22891.entry

I don't know how old that bulid is, but I see nothing diferent,

*facepalm*

http://blogs.zdnet.com/igeneration/?p=1475

That link you posted is to the current microsoft office exchange 2010 beta. I posted screenshots of outlook 2010 that were leaked.

Also, if you can't see the the desktop icons behind that transparency, you have to be blind or something.

Edited by consume

i find it funny that chris thinks obtuse is some kind of UK word.... its pretty common in the english language. hell even if youre not into english much... if you've taken some highschool math you should have come across that word a few times.

anyway, i definitely like that fade more. I'd like it if they even stuck to white and subtle use of blur. Got rid of the stupid crappy emulated reflections in the glass and what not. more simplicity and consistency with good color choices, the better.

honestly it seems like the office and zune people know how to make things look nice. hopefully the windows team kidnapped a few design people from those teams heh.

While I agree that the current UI is more than enough for the task at hand, I would like to see a fresh new look. But for me personally, when I use Win7 I feel its just Vista with some addons. The wow is now eh?

So the most important aspect is how it looks?

Yes. When people look at Windows 7 as it currently is, I guarantee that 99% of them will say "Thats vista right?" regardless of what's changed under the hood.

That's why i was saying that it was better just to keep Windows Vista, and have this as Windows Vista R2 release or simply Windows Vista SP2

i find it funny that chris thinks obtuse is some kind of UK word.... its pretty common in the english language.

Well, I know the UK comes up with some wired wording like "bloody"

That's why i was saying that it was better just to keep Windows Vista, and have this as Windows Vista R2 release or simply Windows Vista SP2

erm no. Theres so much change under the hood, and its far from a "service pack" update.

Well, I know the UK comes up with some wired wording like "bloody"

erm no. Theres so much change under the hood, and its far from a "service pack" update.

All those updates are almost done about same time needed for Service Pack. Anyway, it is MS decision made in their best interest so we will see how Windows 7 is going to roll.

All those updates are almost done about same time needed for Service Pack. Anyway, it is MS decision made in their best interest so we will see how Windows 7 is going to roll.

Still, theres so much change (new taskbar, home group, new user folder structure with "libraries" and much more) far more then whats needed for a "service pack" and service packs are mostly for security and performance updates. Not new features

Well, I know the UK comes up with some wired wording like "bloody"

<off topic>

You are aware I take it that the English spoke the English language first? Its the rest of the world that has bastardised the language to its current level.

Just like a the replacement of the letter s with z by the US

</off topic>

Still, theres so much change (new taskbar, home group, new user folder structure with "libraries" and much more) far more then whats needed for a "service pack" and service packs are mostly for security and performance updates. Not new features

I was thinking without new features such as new taskbar, home group etc. Just security and performance and get Vista really fast, and perhaps go for more radical new version of Windows down the road.

I was thinking without new features such as new taskbar, home group etc. Just security and performance and get Vista really fast, and perhaps go for more radical new version of Windows down the road.

To late to back out now. Plus Vista IS getting a 2ed service pack soon.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.