Jerry Grey Member Posted June 5, 2004 Member Share Posted June 5, 2004 i hope they finish with this sp2 soon ,my bowels are getting loose already !!! is it this month? June?? :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mufdvr3669 Posted June 5, 2004 Share Posted June 5, 2004 Most likely next month, to give proper time to test and bugfix RC2. Probably mid to late July or early August, just kinda from what I've been reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGazza Posted June 5, 2004 Share Posted June 5, 2004 i hope they finish with this sp2 soon ,my bowels are getting loose already !!! Thanks for your graphical input, a tad bit on the disturbing end dont u think? :huh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MicroZombies Posted June 6, 2004 Share Posted June 6, 2004 Quote: "That is huge for a SP" Gerry_74 - SP2 is really not a "Service Pack/Patch" - That is just Microsoft Marketing Speak - In Reality it is a TOTAL RECOMPILE of the "Windows XP" Operating System - Focusing on Internet Security. Think of it as Windows XP v. 2.0!!!!! ;) Windows XP was Cool when it first came out because it combined the Stability of Windows 2000 with the Multi-Media features of Microsoft's other "Consumer Operating Systems". The Only Problem is that the Networking Protocols were Stiil a mess - Hence SP1 (Which WAS more like a patch). MicroSoft has gotten more serious since then. SP2 won't be totally Bullet Proof - But it should be a LOT Better that SP-1. Plus if MicroSoft manages to squeeze out some more performance in there - while they are at it (i.e. Make the code a little more Leaner & Meaner) - then that will just be the Tasty Cheery on top!!!! :woot: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted June 6, 2004 Share Posted June 6, 2004 The Only Problem is that the Networking Protocols were Stiil a mess - Hence SP1 (Which WAS more like a patch). Sorry but that is rubbish, the networking protocols are the same they haven't changed, SP1 fixed vulnerabilities in the Operating System. Longhorn includes a completely rewritten TCP stack not XP SP1 or SP2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrysalis Posted June 6, 2004 Share Posted June 6, 2004 strange I think he is right, on my windows xp sp1 machine there is a windows update which has new tcp stack, this seems to be built into sp2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redestium Posted June 6, 2004 Share Posted June 6, 2004 No :blush:Can't i rollback my system with system restore like it was 1hour ago ? I've got many things on my pc, it take days to configure everythings :( Thanks in advance for your response. Then stop asking for help, thief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Veteran Posted June 6, 2004 Veteran Share Posted June 6, 2004 strange I think he is right, on my windows xp sp1 machine there is a windows update which has new tcp stack, this seems to be built into sp2. That's IPv6, not IPv4 which everyone is talking about here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGazza Posted June 6, 2004 Share Posted June 6, 2004 That's IPv6, not IPv4 which everyone is talking about here. Sorry im not too bright when it comes to this :blush: but what does IPv4 and IPv6 mean does IP mean Information Protocol? :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pulgafree Posted June 7, 2004 Share Posted June 7, 2004 Internet Protocol EDIT:btw, i saw the 2144 . anybody has tried yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Veteran Posted June 7, 2004 Veteran Share Posted June 7, 2004 IP version 4 and IP version 6. Look them up, some interesting info (Y) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kool Box Posted June 7, 2004 Share Posted June 7, 2004 Yeah, I've tried 2144. Very fast but still I had problems with Divx, WMP 10, Outpost 2.1 and a small issue with that NX protection feature. It was disabling by Sonicstage from starting but it did give me the option to turn off the protection for that application. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGazza Posted June 7, 2004 Share Posted June 7, 2004 Yeah, I've tried 2144. Has the rumour about 2144 being RC2 been confirmed yet or not?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daytona Posted June 7, 2004 Share Posted June 7, 2004 Windows XP SP2 build 2144 is not RC2 Windows XP Service Pack 2 RC2 Build 2214 is the lastest Build Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pulgafree Posted June 7, 2004 Share Posted June 7, 2004 Yeah, I've tried 2144. Very fast but still I had problems with Divx, WMP 10, Outpost 2.1 and a small issue with that NX protection feature. It was disabling by Sonicstage from starting but it did give me the option to turn off the protection for that application. I have not noticed any improvemt in the speed of my so. Maybe ur cpu is doing a great job. I would love to have a processor that support NX. Any mod for a 1.4 p4? :p :p There is one problem with Bitdefender (Antivirus), is not being recongnized by WSA. This feature will be available only to microsoft partners or the program (antivirus) need an update? Btw, i have problems with Divx too. Everytime i open a movie in divx/xdiv format, the programs (winamp/wmp)crash and dissapears. I am using divx player right now. This is since 2138. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MicroZombies Posted June 7, 2004 Share Posted June 7, 2004 By "Networking Protocols were Still a mess" - What I meant was that the "Port" implementation in Windows was/IS a mess. Microsoft left certain Ports Open all the time on purpose as a Back Door. If you are Paranoid like me you would have to dig deep down into the guts of the system to make sure that All Unnecessary Ports were CLOSED (BTW check out a Program called "Active Ports" - It works well). The Sloppiness of "Outlook Express" being tied into "MS Messenger" - which is part of the Windows Sub-System ("Services") is a good example of this - we have all become accustomed to "Patch" - "Patch" - "Patch" (If you don't Patch up that Big Hole in MS Messenger you are shooting yourself in the foot - that thing likes to stay on all the time too) by now that maybe we have forgotten that MS should be putting out an OS that is "LOCKED DOWN" by "DEFAULT". Also, Microsoft has been Championing "Broadband" for the longest time now - but as anyone can see - if you hook up a "Win XP" system to lets say a Cable Modem (Which is Online 24/7) with out some form of Firewall (Only NOW is a REAL Software Firewall being built into SP2) in effect - you are dooming yourself to Worms, Trojans, Adware, Spyware - etc. & eventually your System Performance will go totally down the drain!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGazza Posted June 7, 2004 Share Posted June 7, 2004 Windows XP SP2 build 2144 is not RC2 Windows XP Service Pack 2 RC2 Build 2214 is the lastest Build Sorry i meant 2214, it was a common typing error :( prove that it is RC2 i cant find anything that says it defo is! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGazza Posted June 8, 2004 Share Posted June 8, 2004 Sorry i meant 2214, it was a common typing error :( prove that it is RC2 i cant find anything that says it defo is! No infact i was wrong as there is no such thing as 2214 so it wasnt a typing error :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moua Posted June 9, 2004 Share Posted June 9, 2004 So, finally, what is the lastest build (and where to download it ?) ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUKid7 Posted June 9, 2004 Share Posted June 9, 2004 So, finally, what is the lastest build (and where to download it ?) ? 2142...and windowsbeta.microsoft.com. Yes, get on the beta team or wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moua Posted June 9, 2004 Share Posted June 9, 2004 Thanks :) I'm notin beta team but it' installed ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGazza Posted June 9, 2004 Share Posted June 9, 2004 Thanks :)I'm notin beta team but it' installed ;) 2145 seems to be the latest build, i dont think i want to give my opinion about illegal sources for downloading :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhobo4 Posted June 9, 2004 Share Posted June 9, 2004 using 2142 still doesn`t recognize NAV. can anyone please confirm this? AVG is recognized on alternate machine with XP SP2 2096 TIA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGazza Posted June 9, 2004 Share Posted June 9, 2004 using 2142 still doesn`t recognize NAV.can anyone please confirm this? AVG is recognized on alternate machine with XP SP2 2096 TIA Mate NAV has not been configured yet to be recognised by the security centre, it have never been thus far but microsoft do know about it and will correct it either in the RC2 or the RTM version but defo the final release :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhobo4 Posted June 9, 2004 Share Posted June 9, 2004 Thanks McGazza :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts