Recommended Posts

The last time I was able to have any kind of score was before build 7000. Seven always BSOD when rating my video - it's a by-design bug, it's the only time I have a BSOD on my system, and of course this never happen on Vista.

I guess it because I have and old graphic card, ATI 9600, so it's my fault. Since I don't do games, I refuse to change.

yeah my graphics card is the seventh from the last least powerful mobile graphics card

the ? VIA S3G UniChrome Pro II

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Comparison-of...ards.130.0.html

Windows 7 64-bit RC

Base score: 6.5

Processor (i7 920@4200MHz): 7.7

Memory (6GB OCZ DDR3@1600 7 7 7 18 1T): 7.8

Graphics (GTX 260x2 SLI OC): 6.5

Gaming graphics (GTX 260x2 SLI OC): 6.5

Primary hard disk (SuperTalent UltraDrive 64GBx2 in Raid 0): 7.7

Why the Graphics scores so low? I guess Quad SLI GTX 295 will be better.

Well i don't find it worth going from Vista again if MS decides that DX11 is only for Windows 7 then i will be forced to go with Windows 7 just like i was forced to go from Windows XP x64 to Vista because of DX10.0 otherwise i would still be on Windows XP x64.

7.8

My i7 Intel

4GB RAM

I can't really believe that the i7 scores more than two Xeons! If this is the case, then the Windows performance index doesn't really test the processor capabilities of a system

Windows 7 64-bit RC

Base score: 6.5

Processor (i7 920@4200MHz): 7.7

Memory (6GB OCZ DDR3@1600 7 7 7 18 1T): 7.8

Graphics (GTX 260x2 SLI OC): 6.5

Gaming graphics (GTX 260x2 SLI OC): 6.5

Primary hard disk (SuperTalent UltraDrive 64GBx2 in Raid 0): 7.7

Why the Graphics scores so low? I guess Quad SLI GTX 295 will be better.

That is still one of the better WEIs from the 64-bit Division.

Here's Da Breakdown of (likely) the Division's Official Snail:

Intel Celeron DC E1200 (1.60 GHz@800 MHz FSB stock; 2.67 GHz@1333 MHz FSB actual): 6.1

Memory: 1 GB (Corsair 5-5-5-18 1 GB x1 PC2-6400): 4.5

Graphics: HIS Radeon HD3450 256 MB PCIe : 3.6 (the Weakest Link)

Gaming graphics: 511 MB total available memory (255 MB shared system memory): 5.1

Primary hard disk: WD Caviar 40 GB PATA (ex-Dell): 5.4

Will improve my index soon when I set up RAID in the upcoming weeks, it's the hard disk rating that's killing me lol.

Don't count on it too much. I RAIDED my two SATA drives and the actual score remained the same. However, the speed doubled. WEI is broken atm. ;)

It isn't worth it unless you have 4GB IMO.

I respectfully disagree.

I crossgraded for stability reasons (banishing BSoDs once and for all was reason enough given that all my hardware and applications are supported in 7 x64). The fact (amazingly enough) that I actually have better performance under load (more processes/greater process stability/no crashes) in 7 x64 vs. 7 x32 (same hardware) sealed the deal. I have actually *fired* Vista and now run 7 RC 64-bit as sole operating system.

From what I have heard so far the reason why more haven't followed suit is not lack of RAM but because (insert name of application here) isn't x64-ready yet. (The guilty party seems to be a particular VPN application from Cisco Systems; what strikes me as particularly hilarious is that Citrix' GoToMyPC and GoToMeeting *are* x64-ready.)

I would say that if your CPU/hardware/applications are supported crossgrade to 7 64-bit ASAP and especially if you have less than 4 GB of RAM; your applications will thank you.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.