jshimmy3 Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 You can now get the x64 RTM on a certain tiny nova. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funkyblue Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 It's installed and running on my virtual machine now. Any changes to sounds/icons/wallpapers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FISKER_Q Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 Any changes to sounds/icons/wallpapers? Well other than the betta fish being replaced by the real Windows wallpaper, i can't see any new icons, wallpapers or sounds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Veteran Posted July 13, 2009 Veteran Share Posted July 13, 2009 Any changes to sounds/icons/wallpapers? Not that I can see. There might be some new wallpapers. But definately no new sounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thefonz Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 FAAAAAAAAAKE! Seriously? We're obsessed with icons/sounds etc? Surely its the performance and ease of use that is of more interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluxii Media Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 it's digital signature is legit, so it IS a real build leak from M$... whether it's the final build for RTM is up for thought. Today we'll find out via M$, and I expect to be different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrCheese Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 There have been new sounds for ages, you just have to change the default sound theme. It's a shame tho that they kept the same default ones, especially the boot up one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannydeman Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 I see that the x64 is fully uploaded to usenet. Guess I'll try it out :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funkyblue Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 Any news on the x86 version? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yusuf M. Veteran Posted July 13, 2009 Veteran Share Posted July 13, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee G. Veteran Posted July 13, 2009 Veteran Share Posted July 13, 2009 The default desktop, http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/1961/desktopbnc.jpg - of course it shows no surprises ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torrentthief Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 regarding this info from wzor.net: 7600.16384.090710-1945_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRMCULXFRER_EN_DVD.iso SIZE: 3,224,717,312 SHA1: 0x31849B315290EFABFD81F967ED3C553D82925E4C this .iso is on a private torrent site, look at the dates, the .iso was made 19mins after the .exe was signed which suggests that it is a legit copy and not created from a .vhd file: i extracted the setup.exe file btw which is why you can see it in the screenshot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coth Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 it's approved on file-tracker, therefore not fake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannydeman Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 I'm going to install this in a few minutes. Download is finished :) I'll let you guys know and make some screenshots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argi Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 No one is saying the build is fake - just that it's possible that it's not the final. Once again I'm going to point to that blog post linked earlier (which describes the same thing happening with Vista). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geddeeee Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 It MAY be RTM (or close to it). I noticed on the x64 version, no desktop watermark......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argi Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 Because people don't want to read.... Several key Microsoft employees has [sic] firmly stated that Vista has not been released to manufacturing. The day might be soon, but is certainly not today, or tomorrow. There’s still a bit more work to do. Build 6000.16384 is real, but it also doesn’t mean RTM. These days, Microsoft doesn’t have to increase the major version number when building, so theoretically, any sub-set of build 6000 (6000.16385, 16386, etc…) can be RTM. Indeed, the final build of Windows Vista was 6.0.6000.16386. It was date-stamped November 2, 2006 and wasn’t officially announced until November 8. You can still see traces of that build number today when you look at the details of some Windows Vista system files. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrChuang Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 FAAAAAAAAAKE! Seriously? We're obsessed with icons/sounds etc? Surely its the performance and ease of use that is of more interest. Some people would have liked Microsoft to put a new face on Windows 7 to make it 'look' more different then Windows Vista. Don't get me wrong I really couldn't care less about the theme and icons because I will be changing them soon, but I'm sure we all would have loved new icons or something fresh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matw01 Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 anyone who has installed it, does it ask which version of windows you want to install? if not i can't see it being the final RTM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjaak327 Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 The build is definitely genuine, Installed it in Hyper-v. If it is the RTM, is another issue, but the build that has been leaked is genuine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee G. Veteran Posted July 13, 2009 Veteran Share Posted July 13, 2009 anyone who has installed it, does it ask which version of windows you want to install?if not i can't see it being the final RTM No, it doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sn00pY Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 People don't challenge the leak being real - throughout the 20 pages it's not really been challenegd that there is no leak. It's more so "OMG IT'S NOT RTM..." And still we don't know... Even creamhackered writes an article saying it's RTM - well no sorry, but he does not know, and I doubt many (if any) on this board do genuinely know when/if/what/who/why and all the usual crap... Lets just wait and see... We've got MSDN (some of us) so when it's out... It's out... I'm sure Microsoft will announce it as going gold. It's far to easy to dwell on this stupid crap about having the RTM and this build is 100000% the RTM... None of us know... Simple Fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jygoro Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 You only have to delete one file on the iso to choose the windows version to install. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjaak327 Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 It doesn't ask for specific version, however apparently deleting ei.cfg in the sources directory, will make it ask for specific version. At least no beta fish, no watermark and no expiration in winver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matw01 Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 it may well be the final RTM build, but i doubt microsoft will say to ppl go into the iso delete this one file burn it and then you can select the version you purchased. clearly this is not the iso that will be burned to millions of disks and sent out worlwide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts