kilara1988 Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 What is the best stylish script for tabs in titlebar that works with beta 8?With mine the new tab button gets active only when i point in its bottom part,like just below the +. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mopkl Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 /* Tab Fixes */ #navigator-toolbox[tabsontop=true] #nav-bar { -moz-border-radius-topleft: 5px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 5px; } #navigator-toolbox[tabsontop=true] #TabsToolbar { padding: 0px 110px 0 110px !important; } #main-window[tabsontop=true] { margin-top: -22px !important; } .tabbrowser-tab[fadein]:not([pinned]) { max-width: 200px !important; } /* Menu Bar Fixes */ #main-window[tabsontop=true] menubar { margin-left: 110px !important; padding-top: 0px !important; } /* Menu Button Fixes */ #appmenu-button dropmarker { margin: 0 1px 0 0 !important; } #appmenu-button-container { position: fixed !important; top: 0px !important; } #main-window[sizemode=maximized][tabsontop=true] #appmenu-button-container { position: fixed !important; margin: 6px 0px 4px 4px !important; top: 2px !important; } Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unrealistic Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 I haven't done any actual benchmarks, but personally, on both my OSX and Windows Machine, I find Beta 8 to be faster than the current Chrome 10 beta. It's running nicer and nicer with each update. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Heartripper Subscriber¹ Posted December 22, 2010 Subscriber¹ Share Posted December 22, 2010 I haven't done any actual benchmarks, but personally, on both my OSX and Windows Machine, I find Beta 8 to be faster than the current Chrome 10 beta. It's running nicer and nicer with each update. :) Let's hope firefox gets even faster! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corris Veteran Posted December 22, 2010 Veteran Share Posted December 22, 2010 Really hope they move the tabs into the title bar at some point in the future, after using Chrome it is probably the one thing I would want changed, such a waste of screen space on my Macbook. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DexMorgan Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Really hope they move the tabs into the title bar at some point in the future, after using Chrome it is probably the one thing I would want changed, such a waste of screen space on my Macbook. They will, maybe even in beta9 :) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572160 In the meantime you can place them in titlebar with some script. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4nB3arP1g Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Is there something wrong with the text rending or is this what it will be like in the final because I find it hard to use the way it is now as I find it to hard on my eyes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redleer Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 mayby my addons or something but beta 8 went like disco lights on my laptop... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
primexx Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 running well! awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Heartripper Subscriber¹ Posted December 22, 2010 Subscriber¹ Share Posted December 22, 2010 man i am so sick of this firefox sync. they remove the status bar in the latest builds, and there is no way of telling if firefox sync is running or not. i set it up to replace all data on this computer, and its been 30+ min and still nothing. im gettin ready ot just scrap firefox sync and go with xmarks. if you open the customization window, among the buttons you'll see the sync button. On windows 7 it animates while syncing, I don't know about other OS'es Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dnast Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 http://forum.usersty...4&page=1#Item_0 1.0.11 Has many bugs in 4 beta 8/9. Version 1.1 beta 2 fixed the most important ones. I haven't run into any problems with the older one yet, but I'm going to install this so I won't have to look for this link later. :p Thanks for the heads-up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freak180 Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 :D sorry i just had to do it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torrentthief Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 any links to benchmarks of beta 8 vs beta 7? Arewefastyet.com hasn't been updated in many weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dnast Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 I guess they're just updating AWFY 2. I haven't come across anything comparing beta 7 vs 8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iwod Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 any links to benchmarks of beta 8 vs beta 7? Arewefastyet.com hasn't been updated in many weeks. Well basically http://www.arewefastyet.com/ shows it. The best is what you are currently using with Beta 8. Beta 7 is off the latest chart scale. That is why Beta 8 feels so much faster, ( Javascript Wise ) flexkeyboard 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kilara1988 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 Anyone noticed that with beta 8 there is some black square background around some flash items that shouldn't be there?I think this has to do with asynchronous plugins or something like that.( i don't remember how it was called). http://store.picbg.net/pubpic/B5/35/dee2e0c97942b535.png http://store.picbg.net/pubpic/9C/33/6bbcc57a020e9c33.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrian Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 I don't understand the addonbar at all. We shouldn't have to work so hard modifying it with stylish because it was only supposed to be big enough to fit the icons placed in it and expand or contract dynamically. Instead we have... a status bar with a different name? What was the point? Why is it so difficult to Mozilla to implement their mockups properly? The concept and graphics are done and then they refuse to implement them. I like Fx 4, but the addon bar is going to serve the same purpose as the status bar: to be completely hidden and never used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Majesticmerc MVC Posted December 25, 2010 MVC Share Posted December 25, 2010 I don't understand the addonbar at all. We shouldn't have to work so hard modifying it with stylish because it was only supposed to be big enough to fit the icons placed in it and expand or contract dynamically. Instead we have... a status bar with a different name? What was the point? Why is it so difficult to Mozilla to implement their mockups properly? The concept and graphics are done and then they refuse to implement them. I like Fx 4, but the addon bar is going to serve the same purpose as the status bar: to be completely hidden and never used. There are still some GUI issues to fix yet, give it (sigh, more) time :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjoswald Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 I keep hearing people gloat about has fast it is, but how is the text rendering? Has it improved? I've tried beta 6 and 7 but couldn't stick with it because pages look like crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 I've been having significant issues with speed since I downloaded FX4, is anyone else have any problems with it running slow? If not I suppose it could just be my computer, it just doesn't seem likely to me because all the other browsers work fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoneyardBrew Member Posted December 25, 2010 Member Share Posted December 25, 2010 I keep hearing people gloat about has fast it is, but how is the text rendering? Has it improved? I've tried beta 6 and 7 but couldn't stick with it because pages look like crap. I still don't think it's anything to write home about, but it seems as though it may have improved slightly from previous versions. Either that, or I've just become accustomed to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Decryptor Veteran Posted December 25, 2010 Veteran Share Posted December 25, 2010 Anyone noticed that with beta 8 there is some black square background around some flash items that shouldn't be there?I think this has to do with asynchronous plugins or something like that.( i don't remember how it was called). http://store.picbg.net/pubpic/B5/35/dee2e0c97942b535.png http://store.picbg.net/pubpic/9C/33/6bbcc57a020e9c33.png Yeah, it's because of async painting. It's actually a Flash issue, just uncovered by the changes (before Firefox worked out the alpha channel by itself, now it's using the one Flash provides, which turns out to be wrong in some cases) I keep hearing people gloat about has fast it is, but how is the text rendering? Has it improved? I've tried beta 6 and 7 but couldn't stick with it because pages look like crap. It's still using DirectWrite, so unless Microsoft have changed it it'll be the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InPCHell Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Left clicking the mouse and then the middle mouse button, no longer opens the last closed tab. Anyone else encounter this problem? Am using beta 8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyang Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Left clicking the mouse and then the middle mouse button, no longer opens the last closed tab. Anyone else encounter this problem? Am using beta 8. Left clicking on what? I know that middle clicking on the tab bar hasn't reopened the last tab for a while now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bogas04 Posted December 25, 2010 Author Share Posted December 25, 2010 is it just me ? firefox is really using 600mb of ram? :o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts