Recommended Posts

So, is it safer to use the betas or the nighties?

Well, the betas go through QA before being released so they are safer. I haven't had any real issues with the nightlies since I started using them months ago, but there's always a possibility something could go wrong.

Just remember to back up your profile if you decide to regularly use nightlies.

Well, the betas go through QA before being released so they are safer. I haven't had any real issues with the nightlies since I started using them months ago, but there's always a possibility something could go wrong.

Just remember to back up your profile if you decide to regularly use nightlies.

OK. Thanks for the fast reply. :)

I've figured out that the cause of my high memory usage in beta 9 is due to my add-ons. I've tried to disable them all, and enable them one by one, but no matter which one I do enable, the memory spikes back up to around 200,000k. Is there anything the FF developers can do about this, or is it in the hands of the individual add-on developers?

I've figured out that the cause of my high memory usage in beta 9 is due to my add-ons. I've tried to disable them all, and enable them one by one, but no matter which one I do enable, the memory spikes back up to around 200,000k. Is there anything the FF developers can do about this, or is it in the hands of the individual add-on developers?

try turning on image discarding

Yeah, that certainly doesn't look right :/

I can still select the semi-bold variant here, I wonder what the difference is.

Normal Weight - Semi-bold Weight - Bold Weight

How does that render for you?

Well this is quite embarrassing, I misspelled 'Segoe UI' :blush: Thanks for the help :laugh:

IE9 uses the exact same API to render text that Firefox 4 does, the results will be a pixel-perfect match for each other.

Huh? I could've sworn... *looks at screenshots*

Well a little autosuggestion goes a long way, now doesn't it... My bad.

Anyways, I still prefer cleartype on sub-20pt type...

I stand by my claim that Firefox4's font rendering is inferior to IE9s:

The top one is IE9, the bottom one is FF4.

bus.png

bus_big.png

urlbar.png

Tracking and kerning is messed up, font weight too, and font hinting is non-existant. Just look at the 'w's and 'o's in the url bar. They're asymmetrical!

Plus, the outlines are so hazy and light, it's hard to even look at. (URL bar example)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.