[Official] NFL 2010


Recommended Posts

A nerve wracking, nail biting, curse inducing, chair flipping, throat soaring, shirt tearing, fist slamming game. We're fortunate to have had those turnovers, or we would've been playing catch up the entire game.

  On 21/09/2010 at 03:58, Mathachew said:

A nerve wracking, nail biting, curse inducing, chair flipping, throat soaring, shirt tearing, fist slamming game. We're fortunate to have had those turnovers, or we would've been playing catch up the entire game.

good game though (Y)

  On 21/09/2010 at 04:00, rajputwarrior said:

good game though (Y)

Yeah, a great effort by the 49ers, bouncing back from that pummeling the Seahawks gave them last week. Bush's injury doesn't look good, darn knees.

  On 21/09/2010 at 04:01, Mathachew said:

Yeah, a great effort by the 49ers, bouncing back from that pummeling the Seahawks gave them last week. Bush's injury doesn't look good, darn knees.

they have a good team this year, smith is coming around, gore is a beast and their defense is solid, just a rough start.

The Saints look bad this year. With all of SF's mistakes and turnovers, it should've been an incredibly easy win. Instead, it really looked like SF should've won.

We also know how bad the Vikings look this year and the Saints only eeked out a win over them. They seriously need to step it up.

Oh my, ya'll know me. Die hard Steelers fan. I like this season. With Ben out the first four games and us flying low under the radar...we thrive. This is what Pittsburgh loves. I predicted we would go 3-1 in those first four games, so we shall see. Tampa is not an easy opponent, and I have a feeling this may be our loss instead of the next time (Baltimore).

GO STEELERS! WAVE YOUR TERRIBLE TOWELS! DEFENSE! DEFENSE! DEFENSE!

  On 19/09/2010 at 20:41, Azies said:

Ravens lost, Flocco is doing awful.. :/ I'm wondering whether or not he's going to play this bad during the whole season.

Both Offenses looked awful. Not surprising on the Bengals side though. Bob Bratkowski has to be the worst offensive coordinator ever! Ravens (probably) should have one. The defensive penalties on Lewis and Suggs were a little touchy.

I think the Bengals has the talent to beat the ravens by multiple touchdowns considering the turnovers, but thanks to Brat we barely squeezed by...

  On 20/09/2010 at 20:55, Mathachew said:

I think he was offsides. But only by a little bit.

That was an exciting game by the Saints, but to have the ball around the 12 yard line with a first down and a questionable kicker, only to go for the field goal to win it? Run that ball three times THEN kick it, and that decision cost us the game. A great effort by the Falcons, we'll see you in week 16, probably to decide who will control the south.

  On 26/09/2010 at 21:40, Mathachew said:

That was an exciting game by the Saints, but to have the ball around the 12 yard line with a first down and a questionable kicker, only to go for the field goal to win it? Run that ball three times THEN kick it, and that decision cost us the game. A great effort by the Falcons, we'll see you in week 16, probably to decide who will control the south.

or the fact payton tried the douche timeout tactic when if he didn't the winning atl field goal kick would have been blocked... whoops

oh yeah...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsgE1b60WHk

  On 26/09/2010 at 21:46, rajputwarrior said:

or the fact payton tried the douche timeout tactic when if he didn't the winning atl field goal kick would have been blocked... whoops

Don't act as if Payton is the only one to have done it. Matter of fact, Smith basically did it when Hartley went to do his kick (twice if I recall correctly, once in the 4th, again in OT). It's not a new tactic and it's not going anywhere (and I don't like it either), but please, call Smith a douche as well if you're going to be objective.

  On 26/09/2010 at 23:43, Mathachew said:

Don't act as if Payton is the only one to have done it. Matter of fact, Smith basically did it when Hartley went to do his kick (twice if I recall correctly, once in the 4th, again in OT). It's not a new tactic and it's not going anywhere (and I don't like it either), but please, call Smith a douche as well if you're going to be objective.

never called payton a douche, called the play a douche play. and you are right, evereyone does it. when smith did it was still a douche play, smart play, but still reeks of douchebaggery and I would make the exact same call.

  On 27/09/2010 at 00:05, rajputwarrior said:

never called payton a douche, called the play a douche play. and you are right, evereyone does it. when smith did it was still a douche play, smart play, but still reeks of douchebaggery and I would make the exact same call.

:laugh: I love the honesty. It can be useful, but man it can bite you in the butt (Y)

The Bears have seriously surprised me. They really shouldn't have won against the Packers (the Packers couldn't get a handle on their own mistakes), but I gotta give credit to the Bears for making plays when it counted.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.