Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Boo Berry said:

Aren't they considering moving Pocket and/or Hello to an extension?

It's already been done & will be added soon.

loop code is in browser/extensions, the final build step places it in dist/bin/browser/features (as does the pocket addon build) which is the system addons location.

 

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215694

 

 

Firefox’s Tracking Protection feature gets a boost soon

 

Tracking Protection is enabled by default as an experiment in Private Browsing. We added it to give users more choice and control over third party tracking across the Internet. At Mozilla we work in the open and we are still experimenting with Tracking Protection in our Nightly Channel to get more feedback. There are no current plans to extend the scope of this feature.

tracking protection privacy

 

  • Like 7
39 minutes ago, Boo Berry said:

Aren't they considering moving Pocket and/or Hello to an extension?

no idea, i dont keep up with Firefox as much as others do. but why would they Add them to the Browser an then take themm away an make them Extensions only? if there planning on making Hello an Pocket Extensions, why didnt they just leave them as extensions to begin with? i swear, some at Mozilla are idiots 

36 minutes ago, Dingle berry San the Super said:

It's already been done & will be added soon.


loop code is in browser/extensions, the final build step places it in dist/bin/browser/features (as does the pocket addon build) which is the system addons location.

 

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215694

 

 

Firefox’s Tracking Protection feature gets a boost soon

 

Tracking Protection is enabled by default as an experiment in Private Browsing. We added it to give users more choice and control over third party tracking across the Internet. At Mozilla we work in the open and we are still experimenting with Tracking Protection in our Nightly Channel to get more feedback. There are no current plans to extend the scope of this feature.

tracking protection privacy

 

by the looks of it, Firefox/Mozilla Devs are going to have a Adblocker kinda thing  installed by Default which i dont think is a good thing, let an Adblocker Extension Author do it. 

23 hours ago, Demz said:

by the looks of it, Firefox/Mozilla Devs are going to have a Adblocker kinda thing  installed by Default which i dont think is a good thing, let an Adblocker Extension Author do it. 

They plan to ship it as default=off & on for Private windows

Plus choice for power user is a good thing.

 

Plus pocket/hello has landed as system addon(but hidden in v45 for now)

  • Like 7
11 minutes ago, Dingle berry San the Super said:

They plan to ship it as default=off & on for Private windows

Plus choice for power user is a good thing.

 

Plus pocket/hello has landed as system addon(but hidden in v45 for now)

well thats good its turned off by default , i would of thought it'd cause issues with Extension Adblockers if they had of turned it on by default 

3 hours ago, Dingle berry San the Super said:

They plan to ship it as default=off & on for Private windows

Plus choice for power user is a good thing.

 

Plus pocket/hello has landed as system addon(but hidden in v45 for now)

Tracking protection already shipped in 42.

anyone know if Firefox Devs are still Targetting  Firefox 46 for E10's to be default?

 

nvm : http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=13231577#p13231577

 

could some MOD put that link in the First Post Please. easier to find

19 hours ago, illegaloperation said:

On look. It's December 15, 2015 and Firefox finally support touchscreens!

Good grief, every other thread has you whining about something Firefox did or didn't do. Has Firefox drowned your puppies and kittens or why the hell are so obsessed with it?

27 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

is there a way to disable the signature check for add-ons in 43?

yes. go into " about:config " without the quotes

 

 

an type this

 

xpinstall.signatures.required an  flip it to FALSE an restart ya browser

 

having said that, in Firefox 44, you wont get that option, your extensions will be Disabled if there not signed . go an have a look in http://forums.mozillazine.org/index.php in i think Firefox Support for more info

4 hours ago, Demz said:

yes. go into " about:config " without the quotes

 

 

an type this

 

xpinstall.signatures.required an  flip it to FALSE an restart ya browser

 

having said that, in Firefox 44, you wont get that option, your extensions will be Disabled if there not signed . go an have a look in http://forums.mozillazine.org/index.php in i think Firefox Support for more info

please read this for those that will need to know ,https://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension

 

but in Firefox 45 it looks like you'll still have the Preference  to Disable extension signing  check

On 21/12/2015 at 4:32 PM, The_Decryptor said:

Only in the ESR version.

no word as to yet when they'll force the signature checking  basck to on, 43.0.2 disables extension signature checking. from what i been told, by a Dev i keep in contact with, Mozilla are having more trouble with it on Windows  than Linux.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now