Recommended Posts

i have been having problems with mozilla's ftp for several days, i can't directly open mozilla.org/firefox/releases it takes me back to the root directory. Sometimes i can't even click in to /firefox/ sometimes not /firefox/releases or /firefox/nightlies something is really messed up with their ftp server. I have tried using flashfxp and chrome.

 

Try this - https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/

 

FTP for releases - https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/

 

Scroll to get latest

Daily Aurora builds popup here - https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-aurora/

Daily Nightly builds popup here - https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/

 

It works fine as HTTPS  the problem is that ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/ doesn't work with anonymous login anymore.  It stopped working a couple of days ago. Attempts to access the server using FTP returns an error 550 Permission Denied?

 

the problem is that ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/ doesn't work with anonymous login anymore.  It stopped working a couple of days ago. Attempts to access the server using FTP returns an error 550 Permission Denied?

It's pretty much explanatory then, no?

 

It works fine as HTTPS  the problem is that ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/ doesn't work with anonymous login anymore.  It stopped working a couple of days ago. Attempts to access the server using FTP returns an error 550 Permission Denied?

Yeah, use the web access, they've been trying to deprecate the FTP server for years.

Mozilla dont like people using ftp://ftp as it puts to much LOAD on the servers so using https://ftp makes more sense as it doesnt put load on the servers , thats been known for years, infACT IF THE mODS HERE HAD ANY SENSE, THEY'D edit FTP://FTP LINKS out of peoples posts

If you use the custom title bar colors, it looks a bit weird also.

3Kt2eLn.png

 

This code fixes that

@-moz-document url(chrome://browser/content/browser.xul) {
  @media (-moz-os-version: windows-win10) {
    #main-window:not([tabsintitlebar]) #toolbar-menubar,
    #main-window:not([tabsintitlebar]) #TabsToolbar {
      -moz-appearance: none !important;
      background-color: white !important;
      margin: 0 !important;
    }
  }
}



This code only works, if you are using Windows titlebar. Replace "white" with another color or color code.

This code will do the same and use current OS titlebar color, meaning, if you have modified/tweaked your windows titlebar to be colored, Firefox will also offer the same titlebar/menubar look.
 

@-moz-document url(chrome://browser/content/browser.xul) {
  @media (-moz-os-version: windows-win10) {
    #main-window:not([customizing]){
      -moz-appearance: -moz-win-glass !important;
      background-color: transparent !important;
    }
  }
}
 
 
 
Source: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2953415
  • Like 2

Given your InputPersonalization.exe Runtime Error problem, that would be hard to link here

That's unrelated.

Neither Edge, Internet Explorer, nor Chrome has this problem.

Obviously, without the keyboard, I am not able to input any text! Duh.

Firefox 41 beta has dropped! I use the beta channel since it has had a 64-bit version for a while now.

Release notes --> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/41.0beta/releasenotes/

Interesting...

"Memory overhead of AdBlock Plus has been greatly reduced"

I use uBlock Origin so not sure if that will have any effect for me.

Firefox 41 beta has dropped! I use the beta channel since it has had a 64-bit version for a while now.

Release notes --> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/41.0beta/releasenotes/

Interesting...

"Memory overhead of AdBlock Plus has been greatly reduced"

I use uBlock Origin so not sure if that will have any effect for me.

Only affects AdBlock Plus since uBlock Origin doesn't use the Adblock filters like Adblock Plus.

There's probably good reason to blacklist it. There's reports the 353.62 drivers are killing some LCD panels on Windows 10.

 

From reading that thread it looks like that' just affecting certain panels on laptops? Or is it more widespread.

In any case I've been using the 353.62 driver since day 1 and have had no issues (thankfully).

 

From reading that thread it looks like that' just affecting certain panels on laptops? Or is it more widespread.

In any case I've been using the 353.62 driver since day 1 and have had no issues (thankfully).

Samsung and LG panels. For example if you're running one of those Korean 1440p monitors (like the Qnix which uses a Samsung panel), you shouldn't use 353.62 due to the possibility of this issue.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now