"An ongoing debate has been raging since the G5's announcement which asks that we define the G5 as either a "desktop" or "workstation" class computer". Editorial contributor Harry Rider believes that the fact that such a debate exists at all, is a major detractor to the advancement this new computer brings, and that the computer is not either/or, but instead, both a desktop AND workstation.
Since the introduction of Apple's G5, there has been a debate as to whether or not this new computer is in fact a "desktop" or "workstation" class computer. The argument by itself is a ridiculous one, as these titles are solely determined by the manor in which an individual uses the computer. Trying to differentiate between the two terms is a lesson in futility. Dictionary.com defines "workstation" as such: workstation n: a desktop computer that is conventionally considered to be more powerful than a microcomputer. If that definition isn't obscure, I don't know what is!
The fact that the debate exists at all, is a testament to the tenacity of those individuals who strive to to discredit Apple's retail efforts at every turn. The argument goes like this. If the G5 is regarded as "workstation", then Apple's "desktop" is then relegated to the company's G4 lineup. As we all know, the G4 is regarded by the masses (albeit inappropriately) as "massively underpowered" when compared to its x86 competition. If then the G4 is Apple's real "desktop" then the speed crown Apple took back with the G5 is supposedly lost.
News source: OS-News
